Owner ordered to remove no permission build

Owner ordered to remove no permission build

Posted on 13th April 2022

A Black Country homeowner who made life hell for neighbours by building a huge brand-new house to replace his modest Willenhall semi without permission will have to demolish the property. Walsall Council's planning committee ordered Gurwinder Singh to take down the partially-completed four-bedroom house on the corner of Sandringham Avenue and Arundel Road.

At a meeting on Thursday, members heard how permission had been granted for an extension to the house. But instead, the applicant demolished the original property and started constructing a new one last year.                          

Enforcement officers said the new build had caused hardship to neighbours and was unacceptable in terms of size and scale. They added although demolition was a "last resort", alternative measures were not viable.

A retrospective application was submitted but this has since been withdrawn. Mr Singh has submitted a fresh application in the past two weeks and this is currently waiting to be validated as officers await coal mining reports. Committee chairman Mike Bird said he was sick and tired of people breaching regulations and vowed to put the force back into enforcement.

When neighbours objected to the retrospective planning application, there were claims of damage to the neighbouring property. A petition carrying 95 signatures was also submitted against the work. Ward councillor Stacie Elson, who has raised concerns about the issue, said the episode had caused distress in the community.

Frank Whiteley, senior planning enforcement officer said - It is acknowledged demolition might be considered a last resort option and because of that, it is important to consider proportionality. In officers' opinion, it would be very difficult to alter the existing structure without prolonged additional work and prolong the disruption which caused an amenity impact to the area.

It is considered the amount of work required to alter the dwelling to achieve an acceptable outcome would be very similar to demolition. Essentially there is no immediate prospect of an acceptable solution being found and, on these terms, demolition is considered proportionate and reasonable on its own planning merits.

Councillor Bird said: This is a very serious situation, an extension was approved and what we got was a brand-new house to the detriment of the adjoining neighbour. Walsall Council is going to put force back into enforcement. I am sick and tired of seeing breaches of planning regulations around the borough because people think I do that because I can.

"This committee are telling you now, that you can't do it because we won't let you. When we find out, we will prosecute you. Adjoining neighbours have suffered hell. There has been a lack of co-operation from day one so I welcome the enforcement.

We've got to be shown to make a stand against people who think they can build anything they like in relation to the planning permission they receive. Well, it stops here.

Willenhall North councillor Adam Hicken added: Thanks to Stacie Elson for the work she has put into this. The way that this has gone about is horrific. It is way beyond the scope of what was originally agreed. It, as it currently stands, is just a ruin quite frankly.

The impact it has had on neighbours has been terrible. Even from a neutral point of view, all members should share the disgust in the way this has been done.

 Source: Birmingham Live

 


SUPPORTING EQUAL OPPORTUNITY HOUSING